Evolution is the method of natural development. Whether an animal or a car, we are permanently trying to improve on the last model. Most progress is gradual, interrupted once in a little while by way of a major breakthrough, like walking on two legs or ABS brakes.
Just how could it be that the human race, which is obviously the top of food chain, still needs the very best part of per year when expecting? Especially considering that people usually only produce one, rather than litter, let alone eggs by the hundreds. Haven’t we advanced sufficiently by the 21st century to manage to cut this down seriously to significantly less than 6 months?
Evidently we have not, which raises the question, why don’t you? It could be easy to place the blame on the women. Pregnancy is their job after all. But seeing as they got this all-important role since the men couldn’t be trusted with it, we’re hardly capable to point the finger.
So what’s the clear answer? There really can only be one logical conclusion. Pregnancy and childbirth take nine months because that’s just how long people need to decide on a name. Let’s face it. Other species of animals obtain the birth process over with a lot quicker because they don’t really even bother, unless they’re a Disney character.
Our history indicates us that it will take quite a while to come up with a sensible name, so an infant might as well stay in the womb until we do. In fact, there are numerous examples that suggest nine months still isn’t good enough and we must extend it to a year. Just look at all the kids inventively called Junior, or Bob Smith III. It’s an admission that after three-quarters of per year, that’s the best they could manage.
The very first hurdle is relatives. This is specially true for younger parents, who generally have more of these alive, most of whom wish to be immortalized by their grandchild inheriting their name. So unless you’re having quadruplets, you’ve got an issue حوامل.You can’t even escape with giving your son or daughter all four names, because only you can come first and top billing counts for everything. Next is the problem of the particular names grandparents have a tendency to have. This indicates children’s names were a low priority when up against the industrial revolution and the odd World War. Who wants to find yourself calling their child Algernon or Gertrude?
Another problem is your wife’s side of the family. Whether a woman took her husband’s name in matrimony, she will likely want her family name to survive, so it becomes a child’s middle name, even if it isn’t one at all. Just ask Mary Carbunkle Jones.
The only real exception is if these people are extremely rich. If calling your daughter Ethelred Stinkpants Smith puts her to the the top of inheritance heap, then so be it.
Next comes the matter of pets. Not naming them, as that’s easy and they don’t really care anyway. The only real guideline is to keep in mind that perhaps you are in the park 1 day shouting at your puppy, so names like “Fatty” and “Loser” are negative choices.
The issue is that you can’t name your son or daughter after having a pet. You may such as the name Max, but if an uncle had a Doberman called Max, it’s just not likely to happen. Charlie is a great selection for either gender — except if someone had a pet of exactly the same designation that got run over. It’s as if by choosing that name, you’re condemning your son or daughter to a fate of jumping out of a screen, chasing a bird and getting hit by way of a truck.
If anything, choosing a name must be easier now. Today, just about anything is acceptable. If you can’t find a real name you want, then think about a situation, a country or a continent? Even a food-group will do. But inspite of the infinite choice, it’s amazing how many parents mess up. They do not think what sort of child’s name could be changed, shortened or generally twisted into something that may scar their psyche for life. How hard was school for the likes of Jeremy Attric, Philip Ness and Frank Ukwit? Who knows, perhaps if he hadn’t been called Adolf, things would have been different.